floele

Nope, it will only return an empty string instead of the full website if the regex does not match. Anything. Choose one: http://www.user-agents.org/

You cannot use it in commands, as it requires a reference to the URL which is only available during download (variables for example). You might want to use {file:whateverfunction} instead.

OK, thanks. I guess I can fix that little glitch.

Ah, I see. This behaviour has already been changed in alpha 3.

Hi all, I got some internet access here - though I must say that I am a bit disappointed*. No wireless, no connection in your room, only the possibility to connect your own computer (at least) in an internet cafe located at the hotel. Anyway, I guess it will suffice for my tasks. Here is a new alpha with the following changes: +Custom code snippets +Dual scripting (Batch / C#) with syntax highlighting and snippets +"Install" context menu entry for application list !Fixed: Install button misaligned http://ketarin.org/downloads/Ketarin/Ketarin-1.5.0.a3.zip With this I also implemented the feature request "Run command without download for simulation (http://ketarin.canneverbe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=518)" since all code editing areas have a menu which allows you to run the current script. Next I will look into the regex editing and also need to finish the application selection for setup. *Concerns the internet connection only. The location, weather and food is great

At what is that question directed? I don't quite understand what you are trying to tell (me?).

This has already been implemented btw.

Since SQLite is rather concerned about speed, it will not make any effort "optimising" the database for size. It may be possible that there are some gaps in the file as content is removed and added, nothing to be concerned about. It don't see a problem with that actually.

I know, the only problem is XP

So you actually refer to the Regex matching the content, not the fact whether or not a variable exists?

Starting tomorrow, I'll be off to Trukey for two weeks If I get an internet connection, I will continue to provide you with updated Ketarin versions. Otherwise we'll see later

Maybe...Ketarin should determine the {version} for FileHippo downloads correctly and automatically.

You may want to use Process Explorer to find out which environment variables are currently in use and which values they have. Windows might to some tricky stuff with these variables.

I guess these "snippets" will rock. Since I'm using Scintilla for code now, you can press "Ctrl+J" and you get a snippet chooser Make sure to try it on the next alpha.

I'm currently wondering...you are both using some start end tags and the FileHippo feature? Why?

More or less random, yep. Hm...would be difficult to implement. In what kind of situation would you need that?

appyface has a problem with the Java website. It seems to check for some WOW64 string in the UA I believe and displays varying contents.

That depends on what CybTekSol changed. For simple changes, a search and replace on the raw XML might be more convenient than fixing all apps manually. The mechanism for automatically update all applications that have been created from a template is still on my todo list...

Ah, I see. Don't know how multiple downloads fit for Ketarin yet, but might be worth a consideration.

OK, new approach:

Mh....so I assume you often re-use existing scripts? As template for a new script or as is?

Oh...the status bar. OK, that makes sense now Thanks. The lists are so far only available for setup purposes, but they might be used elsewhere in the future.

Variables are supported, somehow, but the semantics are different. A C# script which you can use to directly access Ketarin's objects conveniently is not the same as the batch scripts that have been available so far. If you've previously copied files with copy C:\Performance.txt to c:\\server\\test.txt you can do it in a C# setup script using File.Copy("C:\\Performance.txt", "c:\\server\\test.txt") So there is not a conversion taking place. The question would be: Do you prefer C# scripts over batch scripts? That is, should the other places for commands be C# as well? Or would you rather always have the choice between C# and batch? I didn't get feedback on the C# stuff yet, so I can't tell what you might or might not need.

But those are not quite C# commands, nor am I sure that they are meant for setup. I don't quite understand how you'd like to have these batch scripts converted to C#.

Huh? You mean "post download commands"?