Tomorrow

Jesus. Talk about overkill protection. I guess i'll look for another source then. Thankfully such cases are the exception.

I seem to have similar a problem with https://www.hwinfo.com/download/ The error is the same: "The contents of the URL can not be loaded: Unable to connect to the remove server" Im trying to get the version number from their download page. Global variables: run-kuppet if(!(PS kuppet -ea 0)) {START -WindowsStyle hidden BIN\kuppet 8008} > {run_kuppet:ps}http://localhost:8008/ UA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 App profile: Contents from URL: {>}https://www.hwinfo.com/download/ POST Data: redirection-delay, 45 (also tried 150). My BIN folder contains the necessary files tho i replaced the 2022 Chrome with the newest Chromium. I also tried the older Chrome, but no change.

Not really. He has a point: Latest release (beta, not even stable) was over five years ago. Online database has been broken for years. I dont even remember when it broke, but this too has gone unfixed for years. Low activity in forums by both user and the developer. While it's not dead, it's also not in development. Clearly. Otherwise there would have been something in the past five years. At best it's on life support or hibernation. Not abandoned, but also not developed. I still use it weekly and only occasionally fix something in specific app templates i have when something breaks. But in terms of features Ketarin has fallen behind. Still 32bit, still lacks dark mode and major component of the functionality, especially for novice users - has been broken for years. Besides i would argue that with the advent of centralized repos for apps even windows itself now supports some of the functions Ketarin does. For example UnigetUI is a great modern option to update installed apps. Windows has moved closer to Linux app repo system and is no longer limited to whatever installers you can download from a hundred different websites.

Voted +3 Sad to see no progress on this. It's been over 2 years without so much as a reply from Flo. It's 3rd most voted feature request. The main goal would be to get the main window DM. It's easier to deal with smaller dialog boxes that are white. Looking at other DM implementations it usually takes several releases to get things right. But due to rising energy costs, OLED's as monitors being more common and general move towards DM i feel it's worth considering at least.

For us night owls. Not ma major issue but it would make it easier on my eyes. For clarification: Dark Mode refers to a design where the background is black and text/UI elements are white or grey. Inverted colors is not the same as DM. Also High Contrast theme in Windows is not a solution as that effects ALL programs. Even those that have native DM integration. Proper implementation of DM problably requires some betas and feedback (for which i am volunteering my time gladly). Otherwise it may actually hurt the visibility of some UI elements.

Mine is 557KB with 187 apps. I havent done any vacuuming or cleaning in atleast a year. Seems ok to me. Loads within seconds.

Also depends if you're loading from HDD or SSD, database size and so on.

Settings > Command > Before updating an application > if "{variable}"=="" exit 1

550KB jobs.db here with 187 apps. All are original or modified originals with changed GUID-s to prevent duplicate errors. But yes i dont use Online database and Ketarin loads instantly.

Nope slim installer is still available: http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner/download/slim/downloadfile Just be aware that the slim installer is updated number of days after a new version of the normal installer is released (problably to get people to download the normal version if they cant wait).

Looks fixed. Thanks.

Im still having this problem. It's odd that i could add exeption on my nightly, aurora and beta testprofiles and access the forum but not on my main profile even using new profile or firefox safe mode does not help. Neither does manually adding the exeption to firefox certificate store.

Yep it's a good start but a little too generic at the moment. The download should defenetly be appname.xml or GUID.xml or combination of both. Also need to see the XML inline before deciding if it's worth downloading.

I find this suprising. From my experience global variables work in useragent field. I use {UserAgent} wich is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 at the moment.

Perhaps GUID based check? The app XML already contains an unique GUID. This would allow duplicate names easily. This is a bit more tricky. Perhaps save the last EXIT code value into XML and check that? Dont know about this one.