josh Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 This is due to recent SSL problems, not sure what Mozilla did in other builds. Probably worth checking. This Connection is Untrusted You have asked Firefox to connect securely to ketarin.org, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure. Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified. What Should I Do? If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue. Technical Details ketarin.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: forum.cdburnerxp.se , www.forum.cdburnerxp.se (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomorrow Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 Hmm no problem here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andreone Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 No problem either with FF7.0.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
floele Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 Hm, works for me too. If you keep getting problems, I can refer you to our server admin who might know more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted October 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 FP it is sorry for inconvinience. Already reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crrodriguez Posted October 3, 2011 Report Share Posted October 3, 2011 The browser you are using is likely miscompiled and lacks of SNI (Server Name Indication ) support http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication , which is used in this server for all SSL domains except forum.cdburnerxp.se , which is the default ssl host in case cdburnerxp users are running broken browsers like IE6/IE7 in windows XP which does not support this feature. All other browsers including Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc should work on any OS version as well IE on Vista and later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted October 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Hello crrodriguez, yes SNI seems to be the problem but I got that message while using/testing Convergence, a Firefox addon. If you are interested, this is my report and feedback from them https://github.com/moxie0/Convergence/issues/95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crrodriguez Posted October 5, 2011 Report Share Posted October 5, 2011 Hello crrodriguez, yes SNI seems to be the problem but I got that message while using/testing Convergence, a Firefox addon. If you are interested, this is my report and feedback from them https://github.com/moxie0/Convergence/issues/95 Yeah, interesting however there is nothing we can do about it. When we deployed SSL in this server we tried to not use SNI (to avoid this special virtualhost for IE-winxp users) , however the non-SNI way requires one IP address per ssl-virtualhost and as you may already know, the world ran out of IPv4 allocation space a while ago, making our ISP reluctant to assign more than 1 IP address per server ... We can provide fallback only to cdburnerxp.se 's forums (noob IE-winXP users are somehow still around there :-D ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomorrow Posted October 5, 2011 Report Share Posted October 5, 2011 as you may already know, the world ran out of IPv4 allocation space a while ago, making our ISP reluctant to assign more than 1 IP address per server ... No quite accurate.APNIC is out (Asia) and RIPE (Europe) will be next by the end of this year.Then ARIN (USA) early next year,APNIC (South America) and AFRINIC (Africa) down the line somewhere next year. Granted there are problably still companies buying remaining free adresses en masse hoping to sell them to the highest bidder and many companies also keep adresses in reserve. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion#Regional_exhaustion What about IPv6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crrodriguez Posted October 5, 2011 Report Share Posted October 5, 2011 What about IPv6? Deploying IPv6 is in the TODO list, only thing stopping it is my lazyness :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now